Source : URBAN PHYSICS, WIND ENGINEERING
& SPORTS AERODYNAMICS
Auteur :B. Blocken and al.
Attention ! Si vous pratiquez le jogging, vous aspergez de gouttelettes de salive le suivant jusqu’à 10 mètres de distance. Des biophysiciens ont modélisé le nuage de gouttelettes de salive d’un joggeur en fonction de sa vitesse. Résultats : à 4 km/h (marche rapide) la distance de sécurité pour le suivant est de 5 mètres ; à 14,4 km/h (jogging) cette distance est de 10 mètres. En deçà, vous serez noyé dans un nuage de gouttelettes salivaires (conditions de laboratoire avec vent nul). Solution : courir de front avec une distance de sécurité de 1,5 mètre. Regardez la figure 10 et 12 de cet article, vous serez impressionnés (adieu le jogging) !
Within a time span of only a few months, the COVID-19 virus has managed to spread to many countries in the world. Previous research has shown that the spread of this type of viruses can occur effectively by means of saliva, often in the form of micro-droplets. When a person sneezes, coughs or even exhales, he or she is emitting small droplets – often too small to see with the naked eye – that can carry the virus. The receiving persons can be infected by inhaling these droplets, or by getting these droplets on their hands and then touching their face.
That is why during the COVID-19 crisis, countries world-wide have declared – sometimes by law – a “social distance” of about 1.5 m to be kept between individuals. This is considered important and effective because it is expected that most of the droplets indeed fall down and reach the floor and/or evaporate before having traveled a distance of 1.5 m. However, this social distance has been defined for persons that are standing still. It does not take into account the potential aerodynamic effects introduced by person movement, such as walking fast, running and cycling. This aerodynamics study investigates whether a first person moving nearby a second person at 1.5 m distance or beyond could cause droplet transfer to this second person. CFD simulations, previously validated and calibrated with wind tunnel measurements of droplet movement and evaporation and of airflow around a runner, are performed of the movement of droplets emitted by an exhaling walking or running person nearby another walking or running person. External wind is considered absent and different person configurations are analyzed, side by side, inline and staggered, and the exposure of the second person to the droplets emitted by the first person is assessed. The results indicate that the largest exposure of the trailing person to droplets of the leading person for walking and running is obtained when this trailing person is in line behind the leading person, i.e. positioned in the slipstream. The exposure increases as the distance between leading and trailing person decreases. This suggests that avoiding substantial droplet exposure in the conditions of this study and in a way equivalent to the 1.5 m for people standing still can be achieved by one of two actions: either by avoiding to walk or run in the slipstream of the leading person and keeping the 1.5 m distance in staggered or side by side arrangement, or by keeping larger social distances, where the distances increase with the walking or running speed.